Mockingbird In A Blizzard
By Nadia Ranaputri

Image source: IMDB

Directors: Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck
Cast: Brie Larson, Samuel L. Jackson, Ben Mendelsohn, Jude Law, Lashana Lynch, Annette Bening, Djimon Hounsou, Lee Pace, Clark Gregg.


The Marvel Cinematic Universe is an evergrowing and expansive franchise with 21 films already on their belt. After more than a decade since they introduced Iron Man as the first film in their cinematic universe, the MCU is finally ready to introduce the first heroine to lead her own film, this time with pilot turned superhero Carol Danvers, aka Captain Marvel. Debuting as Ms. Marvel back in 1977, Carol Danvers has since developed and taken the mantle of Captain Marvel (the mantle of Ms. Marvel has since gone to Kamala Khan) appearing in many of her own comic run as well as appearances and teamups in comic runs of Avengers and Guardians of the Galaxy. And who could forget the infamous Civil War II, where she went head-to-head with Tony Stark, which became the talk of the town, but not in a very positive way. However, there have been runs where she does shine, particularly in some of her own comic runs. When Marvel announced that Captain Marvel would be their first female-lead film, there was hope, there was curiosity, and there was some scepticism. So before she enters bigger picture of the MCU in Avengers: Endgame, Carol Danvers gets her own origin film set in the good old 90's.

Captain Marvel begins in the planet Hala, where the Kree empire resides (cue some Guardians of the Galaxy references because there are a couple of them in this film). Carol Danvers (Brie Larson), going by the name Vers in the beginning of the film, is a member of Starforce, a group of highly trained Kree warriors pledged to protect the Kree from intergalactic threats. Despite being plagued by fragmented dreams from a life she could not remember, her mentor and Starforce leader (Jude Law) urges her not to dwell about them, as it might get the better of her emotions. During a mission, Vers is captured by Skrulls, a race of shape-shifting aliens capable of turning into anyone as long as they've seen the person. This eventually leads to Vers confronting the past she couldn't comprehend due to memory loss, as the only thing she remembers is the person she is now: a Kree warrior. In her attempt to free herself from the Skrulls, she crashlands upon planet C-53, also known as Earth. Unfortunately for her, the Skrulls, led by General Talos (Ben Mendelsohn); have also landed on Earth. Vers, with the help of a newfound companion Nick Fury (an ever delightful return of Samuel L. Jackson); band together to stop the Skrulls from infiltrating Earth. In the process, Vers begins the search for her past identity and tries to regain her past memories as she becomes aware that she once had a life on Earth.

Let me get this out of the way first: I enjoyed Captain Marvel. There's a lot you can like from it. Fun moments? Check. Lighthearted aspects? Plenty. Nostalgic 90's tracks? Heck yes. When else can you hear a No Doubt bop in the middle of a battle? Well, it's an eye-rolling moment for some, but at least it's a fun little addition and a refreshing change from the usual battle track that most superhero films have. It has many good moments and it even has some standout visual moments. Some of the best scenes come from flashbacks of Danvers before she became a Kree Warrior, something that I wished the film could have delved in a little more, since it is the most intriguing aspect of the film. Having been set in the 90's, the film takes a slight Guardians of the Galaxy vibe by adding 90's tunes in some of their scenes. The fact that some of the high tech gadgets like Tony Stark's holographic phone or the advanced S.H.I.E.L.D monitors (take the helicarrier even) we're so used to seeing in the present day MCU films are reduced to things like pagers and 90's era computers; makes for a very fun aspect for the film to tinker with. Also, the Skrulls are easily one of the best parts of the film and are the ones that actually provide some of the film's heart. And of course I'm going to mention Goose the Cat because if anyone has ever told you that Goose steals the show, then they are absolutely right. Goose, much like Groot and Baby Groot in the Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 1 and 2, provides some of the cutest yet hilarious moments. 


Image source: IMDB

Brie Larson as the film's lead superheroine has some great moments here and there, particularly when Danvers shows her sass and humor. No, she's definitely not as wooden as the trailers have suggested. Larson's performance as the pilot turned heroine is fine, enjoyable even. Her chemistry with Samuel L. Jackson's Nick Fury (still with two eyes) make for some of the best scenes in the film. She has the potential to lead the film, and for the most part, she does; but then there are a couple of scenes where we are supposed to sympathize with her, and that was the point where the film struggles to really define her as a character. She might improve and stand out among other superheroes that have come before her as she appears in future films. When it comes to the more heavily emotional moments, those that show vulnerability or empowering moments; Larson shines in most scenes, yet lacks in some, but that's possibly because the script and the direction itself restrains Larson from fully showcasing a truly engaging performance. Whilst Danvers herself is a blank slate who knows only fragments of her past self, it's up to the supporting characters to show her the ropes. Fortunately, this leads to other great performances, particularly Ben Mendelsohn as Skrull general Talos and Lashana Lynch as Danvers' old friend Maria Rambeau; who even outperform Larson herself at times.

Captain Marvel doesn't just have the responsibility of introducing a brand new character in the MCU, it's also an origin story for the MCU itself. It has a larger picture to paint as it paves way for everything that is yet to come (or has come, since this is a prequel after all) in the MCU. There are some Easter Eggs that are sure to make every MCU fan satisfied, with little foreshadowings and hints that lead to what we've already seen from previous films (which I absolutely loved). The issue here is that when those things aren't there, we're left with an underwhelming character introduction that while it's plenty of fun; is not very marvelous (I can neither deny nor confirm that the pun was intended). Sure, it's an origin story, but the issue mainly lies within its depiction of our lead heroine through a decent story. There is only so much that you can do with a character who is oblivious of her past. Everything we know about her all is like a show and tell, but they'd rather tell than actually show. Danvers might live up to things that others have said, but the script only allows it to be from the words of other people and not from the acts of the character herself. Danvers' journey throughout the film lacks that emotional depth and development, with attempts to do so being watered down with humor. She doesn't have a genuinely defining moment or heroic moment that should have made audiences root for her. By the time everything is put into place, there isn't much of a connection between Danvers and the audience. Perhaps in time with future appearances in the MCU (starting with Avengers: Endgame of course), Larson's Carol Danvers would have a much more fleshed out development to her character.


Image source: IMDB

While there are so many enjoyable moments to be had with the film, it lacks memorability as a whole. The film is hammered by a story that doesn't always know where to focus on. Sometimes the more genuine and intriguing moments feel watered down by unmemorable action sequences (save for an earlier scene where Danvers attempts to escape captivity in a Skrull ship), particularly in the third act; a sudden deus ex-machina effect, and little prior development to some of the film's main arcs. You'd think that by the time Guardians of the Galaxy got introduced in Phase 2 that Marvel has already gotten the hang of the formulaic origin stories and introducing new characters in an engaging way, but Captain Marvel hasn't quite gotten that same sense of engagement. It's not too reliant on connecting to the bigger picture of the interconnecting Marvel universe, but with 20 films already on their belt, and so many of those having incredible stories and their own sense of voice; Captain Marvel struggles to stand out among those films. It's the prequel film to everything that has happened in the MCU, and that isn't a bad thing, if it didn't come so late. At some point, Captain Marvel feels more like an obligatory set-up than an actual origin film with its own voice.

Captain Marvel is not a terrible film, it's just an underwhelming one. Flaws aside, I did honestly have a good time with this film. The first fifteen minutes or so may be a little dull, but it does get a lot better once Carol lands on Earth, hence the 90's era vibes and appearance of a much younger Nick Fury (as well as the return of Clark Gregg as the beloved Agent Phil Coulson, which I admit, after having not seen him in a Marvel film since The Avengers; caused a tiny joyful squeal from me). While it may lack in some aspects, especially in terms of plot development; it is definitely very fun and at times, empowering. Compared to recent MCU films, Captain Marvel (along with Doctor Strange) most likely fits into the Phase One film formula, basically similar to the likes of Captain America: The First Avenger and Thor, where Marvel had just tested the waters on introducing their slate of superheroes who would grace the MCU as we know it. The film does try to present certain themes while still managing to be an enjoyable superhero film. Despite some issues with the character of Captain Marvel herself, I am still intrigued to see what the MCU will do with her in the future. At the end of the day, Captain Marvel is a superhero film that brims with a lot of potential, but it hasn't quite soared yet.

Image source: IMDB

Overall verdict: Captain Marvel is an enjoyable ride filled with 90's era aspects that give the film a little bit of flair. There are a lot of fun moments to be had in the film, with some even putting a smile on my face, despite some being cheesy. But then again, it's the 90's. Goose the Cat is also a very fun character that happens to be one of the film's silver linings. Brie Larson carries a lot of potential as the film's lead heroine and actually has moments where she does shine, but there are times where her performance felt stiff. Fortunately, this film has plenty of fine performances from supporting characters, particularly Mendelsohn and Lynch as Talos and Rambeau respectively. The story itself isn't terrible, by any means, but it lacks a sense of engagement from the characters who are driving the story, particularly Danvers herself. Captain Marvel is one of those MCU films that are pretty solid, maybe just okay, but that's about it. The film feels a lot like Marvel's Phase One films where Marvel is testing the waters by introducing a certain character. It is still an enjoyable film where you can definitely still have a lot of fun, but it just doesn't feel like a standout among the other films that paved the way before it. Captain Marvel as a character may improve with future appearances that add more development and charisma, something that the origin film lacked. Despite its flaws, there are a lot of things to be liked from Captain Marvel, and there are things that I felt should have been handled better. Nonetheless, Captain Marvel is a solid addition to the MCU with plenty of good moments for a fun romp.

Stars: 3/5




By Nadia Ranaputri 




It's nearly the end of 2018, and I've rounded up my top ten personal favorite releases of this year. Some may not have been reviewed, partly since I did not get to see them in theaters, but rather later on in the year. There will be films that I gave quite a high rating on, but did not make it into this list. One of the reasons for that is my opinion regarding the films that have changed as the year goes by. Nevertheless, here are my top ten films of 2018.


10. Ralph Breaks the Internet

Image source: IMDB

My verdict: Ralph Breaks the Internet is certainly a joyful sequel to 2012's Wreck-It Ralph, putting two of the most unlikely friends into the bright and vast world of the internet. Disney's depiction of this cyber world is as expected, full of wonder. But while it's a whole new world, Ralph and Vanellope's friendship is put to the test once they come face to face with the internet, and it might even resonate with the audience, even if it is conveyed directly. Whether it is becoming a star by making ridiculous videos, meeting Disney princesses and many of their other characters, or stepping inside an unpredictable online game, Ralph Breaks the Internet knows how to poke some lighthearted fun that puts a smile on your face, and it has plenty of heart to give around (metaphorically and literally). It might not hit as deep as Disney Pixar's Coco, but it sure gives enough to tug at our heartstrings while offering much of Disney's familiar joy and wonder.

Read my full review here

9. Avengers: Infinity War


Image source: IMDB


My verdict:
Avengers: Infinity War is as grand as it is emotional, and a splendid spectacle that also manages to sneak in a couple of humor here and there without overshadowing the emotions that the film aims to send. It's safe to say that the MCU has taken a risk that perhaps other cinematic universe aren't able to top for years to come. And they've done it in spectacular fashion. There's aspects of heroism and humanity in these heroes that we've seen grow individually from film to film. With a ten year journey, the MCU has proven that they are ready to take the big leap, the mighty heroic landing with Infinity War. And the result? An epic collision from one hell of a universe that works in many ways than one.

Read my full review here


8. A Star is Born


Image source: IMDB


My verdict: What differentiates A Star is Born from other modern musicals is that it captures something that is emotionally raw, especially when it comes to what Jack and Ally would have to go through in the film. That's what made it shine. It isn't shy of showing how fame can change a person, particularly for Ally, as someone who started out being loved for her pureness and passion in her songs but isn't given enough freedom when drastically changed to someone she isn't. Despite its issues, A Star is Born packs many emotional and heart-wrenching moments that are conveyed successfully.

Read my full review here

7. Bad Times at the El Royale

Image source: IMDB

My verdict: With so many characters arriving at the same place, this film should have been a mess. Fortunately, that is not the case with Bad Times at the El Royale. This film is enthralling and fun in all the right ways. Similar to Denis Villeneuve's film Blade Runner 2049 (which I also loved), it's the kind of film that takes its time unraveling things, diving into each character whilst knowing how to make their arcs tie together. It may seem very seperate during the beginning, but trust me, it gets better as you get through. This film is the very definition of a fun thriller with a riveting story at its core. Nearly every single character has an interesting backstory and an equally interesting personality, it's no wonder that no matter how bad things would escalate, you're drawn into the El Royale and the visitors that inhabit the hotel.


6. Searching


Image source: IMDB


My verdict: I did not see this film during its theatre run, but I definitely wish that I did. The format that this film decides to use isn't something entirely new, since Unfriended used the limited perspective of simply watching the everything unfold through webcam and websites. What makes Searching different however, is how it executes its story. Even if you're confined to see the story through a computer screen, it's a riveting story with powerful performance from John Cho. There is so much heart put into this film, mostly because of Cho's incredible performance. You're instantly drawn to every development, the mystery, and the main character. This is a great example of how to use limited perspective right, by offering a new kind of format whilst also delivering an enticing narrative with a character you are sure to root for.

5. Annihilation

Image source: IMDB


My verdict: Annihilation is a terrifying spectacle of brilliant proportions. It pushes past the boundaries of immersive sci-fi. Beauty and darkness lurks through every corner of Area X, either ready to fascinate or terrify the hell out of our group of scientists as well as the audience themselves. Its complex ideas are not barriers that stop you from enjoying the film, rather you enjoy it because it makes you think, it makes you ask questions of your own, and create new interpretations. There's something incredible in a film that wants to make you think along with it, that takes you into the idea that they are trying to convey. Garland has truly created a narratively and visually stunning film with incredible concepts of humanity and the unknown world with answers that are yet to be discovered.

4. A Quiet Place

Image source: IMDB

My verdict: For Krasinski's first time directing a feature film this thrilling, he nailed it. A Quiet Place is one hell of a thrill, and I was enthralled through every act. Yes, it does have some tropes that you'd find in a survival film, but there's something about A Quiet Place that sticks with you. Since sound and image play as vital of a role as the actors in conveying the story without the use of words; the suspense is amped up that much more because of it. Never has suspense been this effective since Ridley Scott's Alien, or Fede Ɓlvarez's Don't Breathe, but A Quiet Place without a doubt, joins the ranks effortlessly.

Read my full review here

3. First Man


Image source: IMDB


My verdict: First Man feels authentic in telling the story that has been depicted several times on screen, taking it on a different kind of perspective and a new ground. It gives a feeling of normalcy, but it knows how to demolish that sense of normalcy with dread and gritty determination. It puts audiences on the Neil's shoes and invites them along on their journey to the vastness of space and eventually the perils that follow. The cinematography is gorgeous and adds a whole new level to the film, particularly the moon landing sequence that is accompanied beautifully by Justin Hurwitz's score; and is worth seeing on the big sreen. The grounded tone, the intense revelations, and the subdued feeling of triumph is what made First Man stand out amongst other films of its kind that had came before it.

Read my full review here


2. Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse


Image source: IMDB


My verdict: Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse excels in nearly every single aspect, particularly the storytelling and character development. While we've seen Spider-Man's origin being repeated twice already, it's a pleasant surprise to see that since it takes the origin of a different Spider-Man, it goes on a completely new route. What made this film special is it reminds us why Spider-Man is a beloved hero. Spider-Man is perhaps a superhero that feels the most human and the most relatable. No matter how many times he's fallen down, he would always rise up again, and this film doesn't shy away from the web-slinger's vulnerabilities. Miles' journey throughout may seem like a typical hero's journey, but the film makes sure that it has so much more to it, and that's why it's exceptional.

Read my full review here 


1. Mission: Impossible- Fallout


Image source: Nothing But Geek


My verdict: Continouing the franchise's gold streak, Mission: Impossible- Fallout spectacularly nails nearly every single element that keeps audiences immersed and on the edge of their seat. Fallout further cements its great character development that its predecessor had successfully created, presenting challenging arcs for our protagonists whilst every once in a while, adding a sprinkle of humorous banter. Its action sequences and setpieces are as always, thrilling and enticing. Mission: Impossible- Fallout, like its predecessors, truly know how to mix enthralling action, gorgeous cinematography, and an equally gorgeous score to accompany each sequence; with great storytelling. If you're looking for some damn good fun with a great story, look no further than Mission: Impossible- Fallout.

Read my full review here


So there you have it, my top ten films of 2018. What are yours?
By Nadia Ranaputri

Image source: IMDB


Directors: Bob Persichetti, Peter Ramsey, and Rodney Rothman
Cast: Shameik Moore, Jake Johnson, Hailee Steinfeld, Mahershala Ali, Brian Tyree Henry, 
John Mulaney, Nicolas Cage, Liev Schreiber, Luna Lauren Velez.

Out of all the Marvel heroes, Spider-Man's story is perhaps one that's been told the most. The web-slinger has been a staple character in the Marvel universe, but it's for a good reason. Spider-Man is one of Marvel's most iconic characters, perhaps because he is also the most human of all the heroes. We know the basic origin: Peter Parker gets bitten by a radioactive spider, Uncle Ben dies, and who could forget the motto "with great power comes great responsibility." No matter how many ways the story would eventually go, his origin remains the same. Sony's repeated the origin of the web-slinger twice now with Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield in the title role, the Marvel Cinematic Universe, on the other hand, started fresh with Tom Holland as the web-slinger and ditched the familiar origin and goes straight to the already bitten Parker who's somehow in control of his powers by the time we meet him. So when Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse was brought into the picture, curiosity arises. What is the installment going to bring to the table? The answer is simple: a damn good story. 

Basically, in this universe, there's only one Spider-Man, the infamous Peter Parker. But, as the film already suggests, Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse won't be Parker's story first and foremost: it's Miles Morales' (voiced by Shameik Moore), a regular high school student in Brooklyn who is struggling to adapt in his prestigious school. He spends nights in his uncle's house instead of his dorm room, and is enthralled when one night, he gets the chance to showcase his art skills in an underground tunnel, oblivious to a radioactive spider that just so happens to be there. Having been bitten by this genetically altered spider, Miles has to adjust to this sudden change, though it takes him a while to realize what he was really going through ("I think I hit puberty!" Miles exclaims). To make matters even more complicated, Kingpin (Liev Schreiber) is secretly building a machine he calls the collider, that opens limitless portals to other dimensions. Because of this interdimensional machine, Miles meets another Peter Parker, miles different from the Parker he knows. This Parker, Peter B. Parker (Jake Johnson) to be exact; is much older and physically different from the Parker in Miles' universe. Turns out, he comes from another dimension, and he isn't the only Spider-Man to arrive in Miles' dimension.

The first thing that has to be mentioned is the animation. When those funky opening titles start to play, you know that you're in for quite the experience. It is fresh, fun, and seriously stunning. You can say that it is the closest you'll ever get to seeing 3D comic-book style animation in a feature length film. Into the Spider-Verse incorporates comic book visuals into 3D animation that brings actual comic book pages into life. It literally leaps off the page and onto the screen. Even the constant "yellow thought boxes" that a lot of our heroes have in the comics turn up here, and when there's a fight going on, you're seeing words like "whoosh" being flashed on the screen, just like how it is on the pages of a comic book. The setting of New York city is beautifully drawn on screen, like it's taking you by the hand and drawing it closer to the city that never sleeps, and the fight sequences are unlike any other, utilizing its animation to the level that live-action comic book movies won't be able to tackle as well as this, no matter how big of a budget the CGI is. It's a unique take on an animation, which really takes the film on a whole other level. Then there's the character introductions, which are simply put, super fun. Each of the character introductions are unique and nudges at how many of us have probably heard of Spider-Man's origins over and over again. 



Image source: IMDB

For a film that is under two hours, Into the Spider-Verse takes advantage of its potentials and actually use it instead of just dropping it on the ground and never speak of it again. Just when you think you've had enough of the friendly neighborhood Spider-Man's origin story (seeing Uncle Ben die for the third time? No, thank you) Into the Spider-Verse reassures you that it isn't going to repeat that same storyline. But the film does poke fun at the previous iteration, specifically Raimi's Spider-Man, with a certain scene that a character refers to as a scene that "we don't talk about." It still however, has some great storytelling at hand here. The collision of our fellow Spider-Heroes could have lead to a disastrous mess of a story. Thankfully, the film knows exactly how to avoid that. Into the Spider-Verse excels in storytelling. On the surface, it may be your typical origin story where our hero first gets his powers and tries to figure out what to do with it. It is that essentially, but the film goes even further and take the story to a different route than normal. Essentially, it's Miles' story, but the film takes note to pay attention to other characters, emphasizing their roles in the story and their development as individuals and with Miles. Best of all, it does all that without feeling like it overstuffs itself. Every single part of it just works.

Miles Morales is a compelling main character and his arc is one of the best origin arcs in a superhero film. Miles has a slightly strained relationship with his father, he doesn't feel like he fits in with his prestigious school, and on top of that, he's thrust into the superhero world. His development from normal student trying to fit in with his life to sudden superhero is handled with so much care that he becomes a fully realized character that people can truly root for. He's not the type of hero that gets it right the first time, but that's exactly what makes him a great hero. And of course, he isn't the only Spider-Man in the universe (at least when you count dimensions beyond his). Introducing Peter B. Parker, Gwen Stacy, Spider-Noir, Peni Parker, and the most delightful of all, Peter Porker, aka Spider-Ham. This is where the film really excels in: the character building, particularly Peter B. Parker, who might come off as your usual wise-cracking web-slinger, just middle-aged and in the cusp of a mid-life crisis; but he too, is a fully realized character who's more than just a mere supporting character, but one whose arc is just as emotional as Miles Morales'. The film isn't shy of giving them vulnerabilities. These heroes aren't just people with special abilities, they feel very human, relatable at best. It also has some wit and humor that really does put a smile on your face, especially when you have a character like Peter Porker hitting a villain with a giant cartoonish hammer. 


The film does a flaw though: the villain. As menacing as he is, Kingpin is overshadowed by our heroes to the point where he is simply just a villain that stands in the way of our heroes. Since this is an animated film that clocks in under two hours though, not everyone is going to get much of the spotlight to develop as a character, and the film sacrifices the development of the villains in favor of the heroes (which is not an entirely bad thing, to be honest). There is an exception for a certain Prowler here though. Kingpin may be the main villain, but Prowler is the one that steals the show. Overall, Into the Spider-Verse was more than just another superhero film filling the slot of the many superhero films that came out this year, it was a great film that brings something unique while also reminding us why we love heroes like Spider-Man. It brings me so much joy to see a Spider-Man story that entertains as much as it inspires. There's a line that a character says in the film: "It's a leap of faith, that's all it is." It isn't just a line directed at a character, it's directed at us, too. As superhero origins go, Into the Spider-Verse brings an innovative take on the Spider-Man story, especially when it comes to breaking the fourth wall by literally bringing the different dimensions that were originally very separate in the comics together in one film. You don't see that everyday in a superhero film, do you? 



Image source: IMDB

Overall verdict: Into the Spider-Verse excels in nearly every single aspect, particularly the storytelling and character development. While we've seen Spider-Man's origin being repeated twice already, it's a pleasant surprise to see that since it takes the origin of a different Spider-Man, it goes on a completely new route. Miles Morales is a fully realized character whose arc is so well handled, and his development as an individual is spectacular. Alongside him are the other spider-heroes from different dimensions, but among them, it's Peter B. Parker that has as much of a development and an emotional arc as Miles. And that's what made this film special, it reminds us why Spider-Man is a beloved hero. Spider-Man is perhaps a superhero that feels the most human and the most relatable. No matter how many times he's fallen down, he would always rise up again, and this film doesn't shy away from the web-slinger's vulnerabilities. The only issue with the film is perhaps the main villain, but since this is an animated film clocking in just under two hours, not everyone gets the spotlight. Into the Spider-Verse chooses to develop its heroes more because that's who we're here for after all, and it delivers. Miles' journey throughout may seem like a typical hero's journey, but the film makes sure that it has so much more to it, and that's why it's exceptional.

Stars: 4.5/5



By Nadia Ranaputri

Image source: Screen Rant


Director: James Wan
Cast: Jason Momoa, Amber Heard, Patrick Wilson, Willem Dafoe, Dolph Lundgren, Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, Nicole Kidman, Temuera Morrison.


If you look back at before the DCEU even began, the idea of having an Aquaman film had perhaps became a kind of fantasy that wouldn't see the light of day. Maybe it is a little ridiculous to have a superhero who can talk to sea animals and ride on dolphins, but over the years, the character has developed into one of the most interesting heroes in DC. If his future portrayals have proved anything, it's that he's more than just an Atlantean who talks to fish. Morning cartoons aside, Aquaman has been a staple character in many of DC's animated films. He was even a playable character in both Injustice games, and he was cool as hell. When Aquaman first made his live-action big screen debut in Justice League, I was a little skeptical at first, but curious to see how his portrayal in the DCEU would go. Turns out, he was one of the silver linings in an overall disappointing film. I was excited to see where the character goes to next. Thus, when James Wan was brought in to helm the story of the underwater superhero, it was clear that my hype for this went through the roof.

Aquaman starts off with the love story between Arthur's parents, one a lighthouse keeper named Thomas Curry (Temuera Morrison), and the other a Queen of an underwater nation of Atlantis, Queen Atlanna (Nicole Kidman). In the process, they have a son named Arthur, believed to soon be the one to unite the surface world and the sea. Eventually, Queen Atlanna is forced to abandon her family and return to Atlantis, leaving Arthur in the care of his father. Fast forward to a now adult Arthur Curry (Jason Momoa), dubbed as the Aquaman, who is on a mission to save fellow submarine crews from pirates out to hijack the ship. Turns out, he's been doing errands like this for a while, saving people from the dangers of the sea. He's then approached by Princess Mera (Amber Heard) who warns him that his half brother Orm (Patrick Wilson), the current king of Atlantis, is about to wage war on the surface world, and that Arthur must return to Atlantis and confront him to prevent Orm from doing so. Arthur first rejects the offer of confronting Orm, but reluctantly agrees when he comes upon Orm's first act of wrath on the surface. Together, Arthur and Mera journey to Atlantis, where they discover a clue leading to the lost trident that has the power to control the seas, which would bring prosperity to a true heir of the throne.

Jason Momoa nails Arthur Curry. He is undoubtedly one of the best parts of the films. The whole film rests on his shoulders, and he carries that weight effortlessly. It's not a masterful type of performance, but his portrayal of the superhero still has plenty of charm, enough for us to take a liking to his character and root for him. It's a much more grounded portrayal, giving us a whole film to see a different side of him than when he appeared in Justice League. Curry's journey consists of him redefining himself as an individual, to truly step out from the comfort of the surface world to face the dangers of the underwater world. Though it takes place after Justice League, it is very much an origin story of a hero whose two worlds are about to collide, and he has to venture to one world in order to save the other. Alongside Momoa is Amber Heard as Mera, whose chemistry with Momoa during banters are fun to watch, but when it comes to the more romantic driven stuff, it can lead to more of an eye-roll. On her own though, Mera is a fierce character who can prove her own alongside Arthur. The standouts however, are Patrick Wilson, Willem Dafoe, and Dolph Lundgren as Curry's half-brother Orm, Curry's mentor Vulko, and King Nereus respectively. Wilson particularly makes for quite intriguing antagonist, though he can feel a little overdramatic at times, but Wilson makes it work with his performance.

Image source: IMDB

This is one of those times where IMAX is the way to go. Aquaman is a true visual feast for the eyes. Atlantis is a gorgeous underwater city with its own type of border patrol and a brimming city that brings modern technology and ancient architecture together in spectacular fashion. It's immersive, epic, and so well put together (especially with Rupert Gregson-Williams' excellent score) that it leaves you longing to head back to all its visual glory whenever the film journeys to the surface world. It's certainly an interesting look into the fact that the city and some its weapons are powered by the very thing that surrounds it: water. Even the ancient technology deemed to be ahead of its time, is powered by water. Also, since this is James Wan directing here, there's also some spectacular horror imagery, particularly a sequence in a deep sea area called the Trench with ravenous sea creatures lurking in the dark. And the underwater kingdoms that are shown throughout the film are some of the film's striking visuals. Seeing the many underwater kingdoms is definitely an intriguing aspect visually, and another aspect that I find to be most interesting in DC films is the lore. If there is one thing the DCEU thrives in, it's setting up the lore, both visual and story wise. Man of Steel and Wonder Woman's lore lecture on Krypton and Themyscira respectively was one of the film's best sequences, engaging us on the hero's home planet. Aquaman follows suit, bringing the lore of Atlantis to the big screen with an equally engaging manner as the lore from its predecessors.

The story on the other hand, is pretty solid, and it had an adventurous feel to it that is reminiscent of a classic sci-fi adventure. For a story that mostly takes place underwater, Aquaman has a couple of good moments that help propel the story. It has so much potential to go from there, but even when it does touch upon those potentials, there are some that aren't fully realized. There are things that are well-executed, but some that don't get the same treatment. While the pacing isn't all too bad, it's some aspects of the story that's the issue here. It's not generic, by all means (the classic sci-fi adventure approach is admittedly a nice touch); but some of it is predictable, yet it isn't something that fully takes you out from the experience. There's one very particular aspect in the film that is the most bothersome though, and that's due to the fact that it's something we've seen from other films before it. Not only that, but there are some arcs that seem too convenient, like the appearance of something suddenly solves everything, acting as a form of deus ex machina, if you will.

As for the action, it isn't something that's memorable overall, but it is admittedly fun and definitely enjoyable. The problem is not that it's a CGI overload (the fact that is spends too much time in the water is not one of them either. I mean, what else are they going to show besides the sea in a movie called Aquaman?) It just doesn't have much stake at play here. The direction of the action is impressive, especially since Wan is on the director's chair, and while it's still visually stunning (again, the visuals are film's forte) but there's not much tension to be had. While it's certainly fun, it's not something that makes you wonder about the fate of certain characters. It doesn't really raise the stakes very much, especially since certain sequences have trouble trying to balance its execution, leading to many things happening in a single action sequence without much of a cohesion. The Sicily chase sequence though, deserves a mention here. You've probably gotten a glimpse of it in the extended trailer of the film, and if you thought that scene was quite the ride, wait until you see the whole thing on screen; it is truly glorious.

Image source: Warner Bros, Collider

Another flaw with this film is rather a particular arc with Black Manta. Look, I was very excited to see Black Manta on the big screen. It certainly isn't easy to bring a character like him on screen, but when he first appeared in the Aquaman trailer, I was psyched because damn, he looked amazing. Unfortunately, other than how incredible he looks, the same couldn't be said for the character himself and his arc. It doesn't feel as if his arc was particularly earned, especially since the main antagonist here was really Orm, and not Black Manta. He has some enjoyable scenes, and his costume was undoubtedly great, but it honestly felt as if Black Manta didn't really belong here, not yet anyway. Black Manta has his motivations, yet it really didn't feel as engaging as the other arcs. It was too bland of an arc to follow, and his motivation doesn't feel like it earned to be there. He might fit right at home once he's given the chance to be the next main antagonist in future films, but here, he feels underdeveloped, as his arc doesn't feel fully formed alongside other arcs. He's perhaps a character who best shines when he's the lead antagonist, whose arc needs to take up the main story instead of merely being there to be one of Aquaman's obstacles.

Does it mean that Aquaman a terrible film? It certainly is not, and it's not even close to that. There are a lot of things to be liked from Aquaman. It juggles its arcs it much better fashion than Batman vs Superman and Justice League. It has the feel of a King Arthur story with the whole "Sword in the Stone" element (if you're wondering whether or not this is the story aspect I mentioned as an issue in the film, this is not the aspect I was talking about), but set underwater, which actually made for an interesting story. There are many interesting elements at play here, like the struggle to balance two worlds at once, a certain action that leads to consequences, and a motivation merely driven by vengeance. Some are well-executed, but some aren't, and some are things we can see from a mile away, or in other words, predictable at times. That doesn't mean that it makes the fun any lesser. Wan had stated many influences for Aquaman, one of them being Star Wars and Indiana Jones, and some of the influences from these films are present here. Aquaman packs a lot of adventure that sometimes reminds you of the films that Wan had stated to have influenced it; blending classic sci-fi adventure story with a modern superhero arc.

Image source: Screen Rant


Overall verdict: Aquaman is a truly fun ride with more things to like than dislike. Jason Momoa is a likeable lead as Arthur Curry, having a much more grounded portrayal than when we last saw him in Justice League, which is greatly appreciated. Amber Heard is fierce as Mera and manages to hold her own alongside Momoa. Patrick Wilson, Willem Dafoe, and Dolph Lundgren are some of the film's standouts, their performances adding gravitas to an otherwise overdramatic dialogue. The visuals are outstanding, giving us a glimpse of the underwater kingdom of Atlantis in spectacular fashion. The visuals are one of the film's big guns here, because it goes without saying that it is truly stunning and worth seeing its true glory in IMAX. The story isn't terrible, but I wish there was more to it than being quite predictable and sadly thin overall. While it packs some of that adventurous feel from films such as Indiana Jones, Star Wars, and King Arthur, it's hammered by other arcs that could either fall flat or dragged, particularly Black Manta; who I honestly thought should have been saved for another film. Despite the flaws, Aquaman is an enjoyable time, and like I said, it still has plenty to like and have fun with. It paved way to be great film, but it isn't quite there just yet.

Stars: 3.5/5 




By Nadia Ranaputri 


Image source: IMDB

Directors: Rich Moore and Phil Johnston
Cast: John C. Reilly, Sarah Silverman, Gal Gadot, Taraji P. Henson, Jack McBrayer, Jane Lynch, Alan Tudyk, Alfred Molina, Ed O'Neill.


"I don't think we're at Litwak's anymore," Wreck-It Ralph points out as he steps into the great unknown. "We certainly are not," Vanellope says. This great unknown they've just landed upon just so happens to be the internet. As in, the crazy vast land of websites. That's exactly what Ralph Breaks the Internet has brought to the table. As the sequel to Disney's 2012 animated film about an unlikely bond between an 8-bit bad guy and a cheery little racer, Ralph Breaks the Internet follows the fish-out-of-water premise in which characters explore the great unknown, a completely different world known as the internet. The internet is a fascinatingly crazy ride, but hey, this time you get to see what it's really like to step into the internet rather than just clicking webs on a computer.

Six years after the events of Wreck-It Ralph, the once video game outcasts Wreck-It Ralph and Vanellope von Schweetz live a seemingly perfect life in the Litwak Family Arcade. They do the same routine every day: go to work seperately in each of their arcade games and do their duties as video game characters by day, hang out in several other video games such as Tron and have a root beer drink off together by night. But when Vanellope longs for variation in her game Sugar Rush, specifically new tracks, Ralph tries to help her. Unfortunately, it doesn't go very well, as this frustrates a fellow gamer that leads a damaged steering wheel, causing Litwak to unplug Sugar Rush, leaving Vanellope and her fellow racers without a game. Luckily for them, Litwak just so happens to have a new installment to the arcade: Wi-Fi (one character calls it Die-Fi as a joke to how dangerous it could be) or in other words, the internet. Hoping to save Sugar Rush from fully perishing, Ralph and Vanellope venture to the internet in search of a new steering wheel. However, their venture to the internet isn't the end of their problems.

One of my earlier concerns whether or not a story about delving into the internet was a good idea. We had that with The Emoji Movie, and as unique of an idea as it is to have a film about Emojis (well, no one's ever done it, right?) it lacks in telling a good, decent even; story that justifies why it needed to exist. Well, you can rest easy, because Ralph Breaks the internet has a better story on hand. If you're going to sum up Ralph Breaks the Internet, it's a much more meaningful and joyful journey of the internet than The Emoji Movie. Yes, it has shameless product placement like Twitter, Amazon, Fandango, and eBay; but after all, it's the internet, right? It's a never-ending universe where a click could get you anywhere you please, and the film clearly wants to represent just how vast the crazy world of the internet is, but it is not ashamed to reflect on the reality of it, nor does it lose a sense of adventure. The way it's presented here is a bright and colorful world with satirical representations of things you always see on the internet, like figures using clickbait pop-ups that transport those who click to their "site", or virtual figures literally sending hearts to a leaf blower to a video. 



Image source: IMDB

What's interesting here is that it illustrates the internet as an actual world that you can walk around in. When you click a website, it leads you to that designated website, but in Disney's illustration of the internet, a click leads people to be transported into a hovering shuttle that heads you to a website (represented as floating buildings in a city that never sleeps) you desire. It really does give you the idea that while the internet is full of wonders, it's also got its ridiculous aspects, like becoming an internet star by continuously making videos based on whatever happens to be trending or wicked online games with obstacles beyond anything Ralph has ever seen. And then there's the most advertised bit of the film, the Oh My Disney sequence that involves Disney properties from the Star Wars Stormtroopers and cameos from fellow Marvel characters (a certain talking twig is among them) become highlights of the film. The standout of the sequence is no doubt the princesses, among them Cinderella, Anna, Elsa, Pocahontas, and of course, Merida with her Scottish rambling that other princesses could barely understand. It is an obvious showcase of Disney properties, but that doesn't mean it makes the film less enjoyable. It's certainly a fun little dive on a virtual version of Disneyland without compromising the story it wants to tell.

But this film has bigger plans at hand than just the wonders of the internet. It wants to show us a darker side too, though it won't go too deep into that. It's merely a representation of it, as it is with the other wondrous bits of the internet. It does an excellent job in telling both the positive and the negative side, enough for it to create a sense of joy and sympathy. "First rule of the internet: do not read the comments," Ralph is informed when he finds that the internet has harsh things to say about him. Ralph Breaks the Internet is also poignant in developing the friendship between Ralph and Vanellope. In fact, the film revolves around their friendship as they discover the many wonders of the internet. There's issues of being overprotective of one person to the point where instead of actually protecting them, it only holds them back. It shows a heartfelt display of how any friendship will have to go through changes, that one person cannot share the same dream with the other. That's essentially what happens to our friendly neighborhood wrecker and his quirky race pal. Ralph becomes insecure when Vanellope realizes that there's more to life than just daily routines at the arcade; she's found something much more exciting than that. It's the film's core message that is delivered strongly, despite it being quite direct, especially since this is an animated Disney film after all.

Ralph Breaks the Internet does what every film does: provide a sense of both escapism from reality and a reflection of it. It is essentially what a film is supposed to do, and Ralph Breaks the Internet just proves that it is more than just exploring a new world, but also dealing with the possibility of change and as Ralph realizes, how a world such as the internet could bring the worst in people. As surface level is it is when it comes to the thing we know as the internet, it at least has a good story on hand that makes it more than just a fun dive into the internet. It may oversimplify or barely scratch the surface of what the internet really is, (again, this is a Disney film, do you really expect them to dive into the gritty bits of the internet?) but it is enough to give glimpses at just how vastly crazy it really is. In the end, for a story about an exploration of the internet, it has its moral messages. Children can learn that the strongest friendship comes from the ones that strive throughought the changes, no matter how painful it may be. The older can find a poignant message that they could even relate to because they might have already experienced the same thing. I certainly did, and that was one of the biggest reasons why I enjoyed this film, I resonated with it. 



Image source: IMDB



Overall verdict: Ralph Breaks the Internet is certainly a joyful sequel to 2012's Wreck-It Ralph, putting two of the most unlikely friends into the bright and vast world of the internet. Disney's depiction of this cyber world is as expected, full of wonder. But while it's a whole new world, Ralph and Vanellope's friendship is put to the test once they come face to face with the internet, and it might even resonate with the audience, even if it is conveyed directly. The world of the internet is cettainly an interesting concept, but it isn't ashamed to jab at the internet itself. Whether it is becoming a star by making ridiculous videos, meeting Disney princesses and many of their other characters, or stepping inside an unpredictable online game, Ralph Breaks the Internet knows how to poke some lighthearted fun that puts a smile on your face, and it has plenty of heart to give around (metaphorically and literally). It might not hit as deep as Disney Pixar's Coco, but it sure gives enough to tug at our heartstrings while offering much of Disney's familiar joy and wonder.

Stars: 4.3/5



By Nadia Ranaputri


Image source: IMDB

Director: David Yates
Cast: Eddie Redmayne, Katherine Waterston, Dan Fogler, Ezra Miller, Alison Sudol, Johnny Depp, Zoƫ Kravitz, Callum Turner, Jude Law, Claudia Kim.


The Wizarding World has indeed expanded into its own cinematic universe to the point where it has its own logo in the opening. Just when we thought the wizarding world had ended with the Harry Potter series, the release of Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them five years after Deathly Hallows Part 2 provided a welcoming return to J.K Rowling's world of magic and wonder. Though I thought it had a couple of flaws, I did eventually warm up to the film more during multiple re-watches. It provided a sense of familiarity but a new kind of canvas to the world we all know and love. Like any other franchise starters, the first Fantastic Beasts film leaves a lot of room for us to speculate where our characters will be off to in the next story.

Picking up from where the first film left off, Grindelwald has escaped captivity and is on the loose in the streets of Paris, leading Dumbledore (Jude Law), unable to face against his former companion, no choice but to recruit Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) to ready his wand and fight against Grindelwald in his place. This isn't the only task Newt has to take, as the Ministry of Magic seeks his help to track down the person Grindelwald soughts after: Credence (Ezra Miller), an interest to both parties involved, who was assumed to have perished in the predecessor, and reach him before Grindelwald does. Meanwhile, in Paris, Grindelwald prepares a legion of followers with the means of providing justice and freedom to wizards by robbing the Muggles of theirs. In the midst of all this, Newt's journey is then sidetracked by Tina's (Katherine Waterston) return, having been sent to Paris for the same reason. With both Grindelwald and Credence on the loose, Newt is torn between doing what he believes is right and if he's willing to choose a side in the process.

Eddie Redmayne returns as the beloved magizoologist Newt Scamander, and while he still has those lovable cheerful moments, he's slightly lost the lively charm that made Newt endearing in the first installment, but the script would perhaps play a part in this. He's gone a little solemn this time around, caught in something much deeper and a little more personal. The first film managed to show his fascination and enthusiasm towards the fantastic beasts that he sought after, but because there isn't much interaction with the beasts and the film's decision to focus elsewhere, a part of that is missing. That's not to say it is entirely gone or that it's a bad thing. Some of that familiar lovable manner is still there. There would be moments where his loving charm stands out, such as how he expresses his excitement upon finding clues in search of the now reinstated Auror and former companion, Waterston's Tina Goldstein. "She has incredibly narrow feet, have you noticed?" Newt says in awe. "Can't say I have," Jacob looks upon him with a look of confusion while Newt carries along with his search.



Image source: IMDB

The Crimes of Grindelwald has a much steadier tone than its predecessor, going for a darker tone for most of the film's duration. The palette is more saturated and muted, with the bustling and dim view of New York in a heavy rain, the much brightly colored Ministry of Magic in London (which is where Newt's story picks up), and the saturated streets of Paris. It is, like the installment before it, and most of the Harry Potter films; visually stunning. Whether or not the story excels, J.K Rowling through her script and Yates through his directing, they have imbued excellent world building, extending the wizarding world to new heights. The magic and wonder is still there, leaping in a constantly engaging manner. Secret magic portals, the return of the gold-loving nifflers, and a wizard's version of a circus attraction, carry the film's boisterous wonder that really makes you wonder why you can't enter the screen and visit such a world. The opening chase sequence that is Grindelwald's very own Great Escape is one of the more brilliantly directed scenes, immediately taking audiences by the hand to invite them over for what the film has in store. It's a compelling opening and introduction to the film's main villain. It has a lot of potential to build from there, the unfortunate thing is that if you look at the story, it doesn't seem to realize the kind of potential it has to do the visuals and the wonders justice.

So here's the main catch: it has too many things going on at once. The first Fantastic Beasts had solid world building with a much more cohesive main plot. While Rowling has a gift for world building and characters, it seemed that here, what goes on paper has not translated well on screen. The Crimes of Grindelwald lacks a cohesive buildup and an actual resolution. In fact, it lacks an actual story, the centre of what everything in the film is supposed to lead up to. Newt's adventures this time is muddled with sudden reunions and plot twists that had it not been placed with an array of the film's many arcs, would have made for a perfectly magical ride. Grindelwald, on the other hand, who is the main villain, mind you, is disappointingly bland, but it has more to do with the material Depp's given than his performance. You're first given a glimpse at Grindelwald's antics during the opening (which is a great start to the film, honestly), but for the rest of the film's duration, he's overshadowed and sidelined for other characters who frankly, end up not having any purpose in the film at all. Grindelwald may have been constantly refered to as one of the most powerful wizards in the wizarding world, which makes him a dangerous threat, but we don't see that here. For a film called Crimes of Grindelwald, it's quite baffling that they would focus on everyone else but Grindelwald. 



Image source: IMDB

The film becomes its own kind of obscurus, awfully muddled and unable to create a central story with everything that happens. It feels too much like pieces of a puzzle that had just came together, but still separate and incomplete. Think of it like a buffet where you constantly pick whatever looks good. You end up picking a lot of things and before you know it, you're unable to stuff your stomach with more food. That is essentially what The Crimes of Grindelwald is: overstuffed with subplots that eventually flood the main story, if the film has a clear story at all, to the point where it feels like it's been tossed aside or lost its way. The problem is, it really doesn't know which arc provides most to the story, so it puts as much arc as possible to give you a lot more than a full stomach and a headache at best. The constant revelations that serve as a twist are certainly a surprise, but not the best kind. Even when it's something you don't see coming, you start groaning in annoyance anyways because it has more to do with an obligatory setup for the next installments, but little to do with the story it's telling now, like the unecessary Justice League setup in Batman vs Superman.

There's cases of flashbacks, defining someone's legacy, figuring out the past, and chasing beasts, all arcs from the film's vault of several different characters; that are more of a distraction from the story than providing any real progression or relation to the main storyline, which really begs the question: what is the story trying to achieve here? Or the more dire question: what story are they actually telling here? Because it isn't clear at all of the endgame and the core story that the film is aiming for, leaving it muddled and unable to place its foot on the right stool, continuously going on different directions without a clear destination. A wider ensemble and bigger sheer of storytelling doesn't always mean a better sequel, and the issue with The Crimes of Grindelwald is that it doesn't know where the limit of arcs lie or when to turn down the noise, trapped in its own tornado of potential arcs that don't have a center to intertwine together. The first installment, despite having a similar problem, was at least able to tie most arcs together and have a clear story. Newt's coming to America, Credence and his adopted mother, Percival Graves and his obsession with finding the person behind the obscurus; they all serve a purpose to the main story.

But at least there's the beasts, right? Yes, but let's stop at that. They're simply decorations, admired but hardly play a part in the party other than to give the room (or the film in this case) some flair. They do provide some of the film's illustrious charm, but again, they're really just toppings on an ice cream. Other than the beasts, it is really the performances that are the film's shining beacon, particularly Jude Law as Dumbledore. In a muddled mess of a film with a one note villain, the return of a beloved character becomes the film's savior. This Dumbledore, a much younger and more active wizard, provides a much needed charm. Unfortunately, his part is fairly small here, perhaps saved for another film, because there are other things this film intend to focus on. But when he's on screen, his wit and calm demeanor is enough to leave audiences wanting more of Law's portrayal. When it comes to his scenes and at Hogwarts (Potterheads, you better be ready for a pang of nostalgia when this happens), there's always that speck of hope that the film does have its moments, and it actually does have its moments, enough for it to not fully be a mess, enjoyable at best. Hopefully with a more cohesive story at hand next time, it could lead future installments to a magical homerun.



Image source: IMDB

Overall verdict: The Crimes of Grindelwald is certainly intriguing when it comes to charming audiences with its glorious wonders of the wizarding world. Redmayne, despite his character losing a little of that charm that made him endearing, is still quite excellent in the lead role. Jude Law as Dumbledore is perhaps the standout out of the cast, making the most out of his limited screen time. This installment still carries on the charm and wonder that the previous installment, and the Harry Potter films, had brilliantly brought, though it lacks the feeling of an actual adventure that the first Fantastic Beasts installment excelled at. The story however, however, is muddled and plucks arcs that seem interesting, and places them on a plate without any coherence as to where it's supposed to go. The revelations feel like a confusing setup for the next installments rather than serving the story it's telling in this one. Because it's overstuffed with incoherent arcs, it loses the story it wants to tell in the progress, which is unfortunate, especially since they have nearly every untapped potential, just waiting to discovered.

Stars: 2.7/5



By Nadia Ranaputri

Image source: IMDB


Director: Bryan Singer
Cast: Rami Malek, Lucy Boynton, Ben Hardy, Gwilym Lee, Joseph Mazzello, Aidan Gillen, Tom Hollander, Mike Myers.


Believe it or not, the very first exposure I had to Queen was through Ella Enchanted, where Anne Hathaway belted out 'Somebody to Love' in a pub filled with giants. My then nine year old self upon watching the film at the time believed that it was the film's original song, which is silly considering that I then found out that it was a cover of the song that was originally sung by none other than Queen. To this day, Queen remains as one of the most iconic bands in history, their songs have hit the top of the charts several times and used in several films such as Ella Enchanted (Somebody to Love), Wayne's World (Bohemian Rhapsody), Shaun of the Dead ('Don't Stop Me Now' and 'You're My Best Friend'), and even had multiple songs covered by Glee. Queen is loved by the masses from one generation to another. Bryan Singer's new biopic, Bohemian Rhapsody, aims to tell the story of just how this band entered the music forray and the story of their eccentric frontrunner, Freddie Mercury; to the modern audience.

Bohemian Rhapsody starts off with the soon-to-be Queen front runner Freddie Mercury (born Farrokh Bulsara) moving luggages in Heathrow Airport during the day. At night though, he visits a local pub and listens to a band he's been following, hoping to show some of his songs to them. Turns out, it's his lucky day, because the band's lead singer just so happens to abandon the band just after their performance, leaving the spot open to Freddie, who eagerly leaps to take the opportunity. As they begin playing in other local gigs, they begin to get recognized when music manager John Reid (Aiden Gillen) stumbles upon their recording booth. They begin to work with Reid and with the support of their label EMI (run by Ray Foster (Mike Myers), who's reluctant over the band's experimental delve in music), they begin their tour around the world, selling out shows, and becoming the band that everyone knows and loves. However, as their success rises, their personal issues follow suit, particularly Freddie, who's figuring out his sexual orientation, despite being happily in love with his partner Mary Austin (Lucy Boynton); and the media's eventual intrusion on his personal life.

Rami Malek is a star stunner as Freddie Mercury, fully embracing the frontman's enigmatic mannerisms and his passion in creating music. Malek not only nails Mercury's look, but his spontenaeous ways and every bit of how Mercury works on stage. Mercury's struts, flaunts, turns, and flicks are so intricately portrayed and Malek just dissolves into Mercury, getting almost every bit of the frontrunner's moves. At times, he's doe-eyed and curious, especially during his younger years, eagerly following a band he's fond of and willing to impress the remaining band members who just so happens to be Brian May and Roger Taylor when he finds that the band's lead singer had just quit. When he gets on stage, that's where he sheds that doe-eyed look and trades it for sharp turns and magnetic sway. You're instantly drawn into his portrayal with his every turn at the beat. And even when it comes to his more vulnerable moments, Malek just outshines every other actor in the room, making sure that Mercury's inner search for identity and struggle comes through on screen. Queen's other band members, Roger Taylor, Brian May, and John Deacon, played respectively by Ben Hardy, Gwilym Lee, and Joe Mazzello; all put impressive performances and create a genuine dynamic together with Malek, despite them not being as established as Malek's Freddie Mercury. 


Image source: IMDB


The thing that really made Bohemian Rhapsody a gem is its artistic aspects. The recreation of Queen's musical numbers is spectacular to watch, especially if you're fond of Queen, you're likely to sing along and have a good time doing it. Each of the performances are captivating, capturing the essence of what made Queen's performances so iconic, especially with Malek brilliantly embodying Mercury's mannerisms on stage. The Live Aid performance gets a special mention here because it is really where the film takes the high road and gives Queen the performance of their lives. This is also where I admittedly shed tears in sheer delight of how amazing this sequence was recreated and the performances in it. And what also made it mesmerizing was its cinematography, which is really quite something, from the opening long shot of Freddie getting ready to enter the stage to the beat of 'Somebody to Love' that ends with a glide of the massive audience awaiting Queen's performance (which is actually one of my most favorite sequences of the film), to a wide shot of Queen performing the hell out of a show. It's visually appealing, and is the aspect apart from the performances that prevents the film from fully crashing down.

Spanning the 15 years of their rise to stardom and eventual success, Bohemian Rhapsody has the weight of cramming the many events that occur during those fifteen years, like who Freddie Mercury was before he was Freddie Mercury, how the band was brought together, how they got their band name Queen, and the struggles they had in making it in the music scene. It is suprisingly fast paced for a film that's more than two hours, but then again, it does have a lot to cover. For the first hour, the film is filled with quirky wit that does work most of the time, like the doe-eyed young Mercury belting out tunes in the parking lot in front of his future bandmates Brian May and Roger Taylor, his eccentric choice in fashion ("I've got to make an impression, darling," he confidently says when he's questioned about his clothing), the band mixing non-musical objects with their music, or Roger Taylor constantly having to repeat his high notes on the "Galileo" part in the 'Bohemian Rhapsody' song several times until the recording tape is nearly spent. But their dedication in showcasing their music to the world is relentless, from only playing in pubs to becoming one of the most iconic bands in history- from their music producer stating, "Mark my words, no one will play Queen," to the point where one of the characters say in the film, "When they hear Queen, ears perk up."

Bohemian Rhapsody manages to present the fact that despite their success, Queen has their issues as a band. There are scenes where they argue over whose song they want to use (one fairly hilarious scene being an argument about whether or not they want to use Roger Taylor's song 'I'm in Love with My Car' that leads to Taylor nearly throwing a coffee machine), and questioning some creative decisions regarding the songs. But at its center is Freddie Mercury's personal life, struggling with his sexuality and trying to keep anyone else besides the people closest to him from prying into anything other than his music. It is at most parts, executed well and also heartbreaking at some point, humanizing Queen's eccentric lead singer. This is mostly propelled by Malek's performances, who is effortless in portraying Mercury's struggles between his personal choices both in music and in his lifestyle. Mercury has personal issues that clashes alongside the media that constantly barges him with questions of interest regarding his sexuality, the focus merely on him than his band and their music. He throws lavish parties in his mansion, but cannot bring himself to face the fact that he'll eventually be alone at some point, asking his bandmates or his former partner Mary Austin to accompany him for dinner or for a drink when he spends the night alone.


Image source: IMDB

But when it comes to how Mercury's personal drama that surrounds him was executed during the second half of the film, that's where it gets most of its ups and downs. It's understandable that some things won't go into focus, but sometimes the film feels confused between wanting to focus on Mercury or Queen. It mainly focuses on the former, but that would mean the other members would have to take a back seat, though they're not fully shadowed by Mercury here. At some parts, it may feel underwhelming, mainly due to the pacing of each sequence (save for the Live Aid performance). Sometimes sudden developments are thrown at us without prior foundation as to why it was there, and it may take you aback for a second, particularly at the band's road to stardom and deep insight into their struggles as a band. It really jumps too swiftly from having the band do small gigs, and the next thing you know, they have a manager that's suddenly convinced to work with them by a single statement and sky-rocketting to instant fame. Some might be bothered by that, and to tell you the truth, I was slightly bothered by it too. It does affect the story and even if it does manage to show Mercury and Queen's struggles in a way that made them accessible to tug at heartstrings, it's everything else that surrounds them that prevents the film from hitting that sweet high note, the homerun that could have made it great.

Flaws aside, Bohemian Rhapsody was honestly very enjoyable, capturing some of Queen's essence as a band and their experimental music that would become much loved and iconic until today (though yes, there are some errors in the accurate depiction of for example, the era of a song's initial release). It's eccentricly magnetic in all the right ways, there's a big amount of wonderful chemistry between Malek, Hardy, Lee, and Mazzello. There's a brilliant scene where their music producer refuses to take risks with the band, and the band replies to this by stating that the name Queen serves as a mystery, that they could take any genre of music and incorporate it into theirs. It's scenes like those that really made Bohemian Rhapsody shine. It's captivating when the band starts to belt out the iconic tunes, but sometimes lacks when it comes to some part of the film's story execution, though I have to admit, it is still a damn good time. When walking out of this film, you're really going to leave with one thing in mind: that Queen and their lead singer Freddie Mercury will forever remain as icons for the ages. "You're a legend, Fred," Roger Taylor says. Mercury smiles and with the outmost fondness, says back, "We're all legends."


Image source: IMDB


Overall verdict: Bohemian Rhapsody thrives in visual appeal, recreating Queen's performances in spectacular fashion, led by Rami Malek's magnetic performance as Freddie Mercury. Malek stuns in embodying Queen's frontruner with his eccentric mannerisms on stage, drawing us to his performance. Ben Hardy, Gwilym Lee, and Joe Mazzello manages to stand alongside Malek fairly well, particularly when it came to the band's dynamic. Its striking cinematography is also where the film really shines through, capturing each performance, be it on stage or behind it. However, it does suffer in pacing that affects the story, making sudden developments happen that could take the audience aback for a second. Some things could have been explored more, but since it's cramming a story spanning 15 years, it is understandable that not everything is going go be delved further. Despite that, Bohemian Rhapsody really is a good time, and it's the kind of film that you'd sing your heart out shamelessly through every Queen song that plays throughout the film. It's not exactly a homerun, but it has every potential to be, and for nearly much of the parts, it does realize that.

Stars: 3.5/5

Trailer
Newer Posts Older Posts Home

HELLO THERE!

Welcome to my blog! I'm an English Literature graduate navigating through a sea of films and books.

Categories

  • Articles/Editorials 12
  • Film Reviews 84
  • Movie Rewinds 6
  • Series Reviews 5

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Advertisement

Powered by Blogger.

Report Abuse

  • Home
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • ▼  2021 (15)
    • ▼  July (1)
      • Mid Year Book Freak Out Tag (+ video!)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2020 (10)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  February (2)
  • ►  2019 (9)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2018 (26)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (3)
  • ►  2017 (27)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2016 (20)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)

Search This Blog

Blog Archive

  • 2021 15
    • July 1
      • Mid Year Book Freak Out Tag (+ video!)
    • June 2
    • May 1
    • March 2
    • February 4
    • January 5
  • 2020 10
    • December 5
    • November 1
    • May 2
    • February 2
  • 2019 9
    • November 3
    • October 1
    • September 1
    • July 1
    • May 2
    • March 1
  • 2018 26
    • December 3
    • November 3
    • October 3
    • September 1
    • July 3
    • June 2
    • May 2
    • April 3
    • March 3
    • February 3
  • 2017 27
    • December 4
    • November 1
    • October 5
    • September 4
    • August 2
    • July 3
    • May 2
    • April 1
    • March 3
    • January 2
  • 2016 20
    • December 2
    • November 8
    • October 4
    • September 3
    • May 1
    • April 1
    • March 1
Show more Show less

Pages

  • Home
  • Home
  • Film Reviews
  • Series Reviews
  • Movie Rewinds
  • Editorials
  • What's Listed
  • Home
  • Features
  • _post format
  • _error page
  • Beauty
  • Fashion
  • Lifestyle
  • Contact
  • Buy now

Popular Posts

  • The Trial of the Chicago 7- Review
    By Nadia Ranaputri Image credit: IMDB Director: Aaron Sorkin Cast: Eddie Redmayne, Sacha Baron Cohen, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Mark Rylance, Je...
  • Nomadland- Review
    By Nadia Ranaputri Image credit: IMDB Director: ChloƩ Zhao Cast: Frances McDormand, David Straithairn, Linda May, Swankie, Peter Spears, Bo...
  • Judas and the Black Messiah- Review
    By Nadia Ranaputri Image source: WBUR Director: Shaka King Cast: Lakeith Stanfield, Daniel Kaluuya, Jesse Plemons, Dominique Fishback, Darre...
  • Home
  • Features
    • Error Page
    • Short Codes
  • Documentation
  • Download This Template

featured posts

Advertisement

Copyright © Mockingbird In A Blizzard. Designed by OddThemes