Mockingbird In A Blizzard
By Nadia Ranaputri 


Image source: IMDB

Directors: Rich Moore and Phil Johnston
Cast: John C. Reilly, Sarah Silverman, Gal Gadot, Taraji P. Henson, Jack McBrayer, Jane Lynch, Alan Tudyk, Alfred Molina, Ed O'Neill.


"I don't think we're at Litwak's anymore," Wreck-It Ralph points out as he steps into the great unknown. "We certainly are not," Vanellope says. This great unknown they've just landed upon just so happens to be the internet. As in, the crazy vast land of websites. That's exactly what Ralph Breaks the Internet has brought to the table. As the sequel to Disney's 2012 animated film about an unlikely bond between an 8-bit bad guy and a cheery little racer, Ralph Breaks the Internet follows the fish-out-of-water premise in which characters explore the great unknown, a completely different world known as the internet. The internet is a fascinatingly crazy ride, but hey, this time you get to see what it's really like to step into the internet rather than just clicking webs on a computer.

Six years after the events of Wreck-It Ralph, the once video game outcasts Wreck-It Ralph and Vanellope von Schweetz live a seemingly perfect life in the Litwak Family Arcade. They do the same routine every day: go to work seperately in each of their arcade games and do their duties as video game characters by day, hang out in several other video games such as Tron and have a root beer drink off together by night. But when Vanellope longs for variation in her game Sugar Rush, specifically new tracks, Ralph tries to help her. Unfortunately, it doesn't go very well, as this frustrates a fellow gamer that leads a damaged steering wheel, causing Litwak to unplug Sugar Rush, leaving Vanellope and her fellow racers without a game. Luckily for them, Litwak just so happens to have a new installment to the arcade: Wi-Fi (one character calls it Die-Fi as a joke to how dangerous it could be) or in other words, the internet. Hoping to save Sugar Rush from fully perishing, Ralph and Vanellope venture to the internet in search of a new steering wheel. However, their venture to the internet isn't the end of their problems.

One of my earlier concerns whether or not a story about delving into the internet was a good idea. We had that with The Emoji Movie, and as unique of an idea as it is to have a film about Emojis (well, no one's ever done it, right?) it lacks in telling a good, decent even; story that justifies why it needed to exist. Well, you can rest easy, because Ralph Breaks the internet has a better story on hand. If you're going to sum up Ralph Breaks the Internet, it's a much more meaningful and joyful journey of the internet than The Emoji Movie. Yes, it has shameless product placement like Twitter, Amazon, Fandango, and eBay; but after all, it's the internet, right? It's a never-ending universe where a click could get you anywhere you please, and the film clearly wants to represent just how vast the crazy world of the internet is, but it is not ashamed to reflect on the reality of it, nor does it lose a sense of adventure. The way it's presented here is a bright and colorful world with satirical representations of things you always see on the internet, like figures using clickbait pop-ups that transport those who click to their "site", or virtual figures literally sending hearts to a leaf blower to a video. 



Image source: IMDB

What's interesting here is that it illustrates the internet as an actual world that you can walk around in. When you click a website, it leads you to that designated website, but in Disney's illustration of the internet, a click leads people to be transported into a hovering shuttle that heads you to a website (represented as floating buildings in a city that never sleeps) you desire. It really does give you the idea that while the internet is full of wonders, it's also got its ridiculous aspects, like becoming an internet star by continuously making videos based on whatever happens to be trending or wicked online games with obstacles beyond anything Ralph has ever seen. And then there's the most advertised bit of the film, the Oh My Disney sequence that involves Disney properties from the Star Wars Stormtroopers and cameos from fellow Marvel characters (a certain talking twig is among them) become highlights of the film. The standout of the sequence is no doubt the princesses, among them Cinderella, Anna, Elsa, Pocahontas, and of course, Merida with her Scottish rambling that other princesses could barely understand. It is an obvious showcase of Disney properties, but that doesn't mean it makes the film less enjoyable. It's certainly a fun little dive on a virtual version of Disneyland without compromising the story it wants to tell.

But this film has bigger plans at hand than just the wonders of the internet. It wants to show us a darker side too, though it won't go too deep into that. It's merely a representation of it, as it is with the other wondrous bits of the internet. It does an excellent job in telling both the positive and the negative side, enough for it to create a sense of joy and sympathy. "First rule of the internet: do not read the comments," Ralph is informed when he finds that the internet has harsh things to say about him. Ralph Breaks the Internet is also poignant in developing the friendship between Ralph and Vanellope. In fact, the film revolves around their friendship as they discover the many wonders of the internet. There's issues of being overprotective of one person to the point where instead of actually protecting them, it only holds them back. It shows a heartfelt display of how any friendship will have to go through changes, that one person cannot share the same dream with the other. That's essentially what happens to our friendly neighborhood wrecker and his quirky race pal. Ralph becomes insecure when Vanellope realizes that there's more to life than just daily routines at the arcade; she's found something much more exciting than that. It's the film's core message that is delivered strongly, despite it being quite direct, especially since this is an animated Disney film after all.

Ralph Breaks the Internet does what every film does: provide a sense of both escapism from reality and a reflection of it. It is essentially what a film is supposed to do, and Ralph Breaks the Internet just proves that it is more than just exploring a new world, but also dealing with the possibility of change and as Ralph realizes, how a world such as the internet could bring the worst in people. As surface level is it is when it comes to the thing we know as the internet, it at least has a good story on hand that makes it more than just a fun dive into the internet. It may oversimplify or barely scratch the surface of what the internet really is, (again, this is a Disney film, do you really expect them to dive into the gritty bits of the internet?) but it is enough to give glimpses at just how vastly crazy it really is. In the end, for a story about an exploration of the internet, it has its moral messages. Children can learn that the strongest friendship comes from the ones that strive throughought the changes, no matter how painful it may be. The older can find a poignant message that they could even relate to because they might have already experienced the same thing. I certainly did, and that was one of the biggest reasons why I enjoyed this film, I resonated with it. 



Image source: IMDB



Overall verdict: Ralph Breaks the Internet is certainly a joyful sequel to 2012's Wreck-It Ralph, putting two of the most unlikely friends into the bright and vast world of the internet. Disney's depiction of this cyber world is as expected, full of wonder. But while it's a whole new world, Ralph and Vanellope's friendship is put to the test once they come face to face with the internet, and it might even resonate with the audience, even if it is conveyed directly. The world of the internet is cettainly an interesting concept, but it isn't ashamed to jab at the internet itself. Whether it is becoming a star by making ridiculous videos, meeting Disney princesses and many of their other characters, or stepping inside an unpredictable online game, Ralph Breaks the Internet knows how to poke some lighthearted fun that puts a smile on your face, and it has plenty of heart to give around (metaphorically and literally). It might not hit as deep as Disney Pixar's Coco, but it sure gives enough to tug at our heartstrings while offering much of Disney's familiar joy and wonder.

Stars: 4.3/5



By Nadia Ranaputri


Image source: IMDB

Director: David Yates
Cast: Eddie Redmayne, Katherine Waterston, Dan Fogler, Ezra Miller, Alison Sudol, Johnny Depp, Zoƫ Kravitz, Callum Turner, Jude Law, Claudia Kim.


The Wizarding World has indeed expanded into its own cinematic universe to the point where it has its own logo in the opening. Just when we thought the wizarding world had ended with the Harry Potter series, the release of Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them five years after Deathly Hallows Part 2 provided a welcoming return to J.K Rowling's world of magic and wonder. Though I thought it had a couple of flaws, I did eventually warm up to the film more during multiple re-watches. It provided a sense of familiarity but a new kind of canvas to the world we all know and love. Like any other franchise starters, the first Fantastic Beasts film leaves a lot of room for us to speculate where our characters will be off to in the next story.

Picking up from where the first film left off, Grindelwald has escaped captivity and is on the loose in the streets of Paris, leading Dumbledore (Jude Law), unable to face against his former companion, no choice but to recruit Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) to ready his wand and fight against Grindelwald in his place. This isn't the only task Newt has to take, as the Ministry of Magic seeks his help to track down the person Grindelwald soughts after: Credence (Ezra Miller), an interest to both parties involved, who was assumed to have perished in the predecessor, and reach him before Grindelwald does. Meanwhile, in Paris, Grindelwald prepares a legion of followers with the means of providing justice and freedom to wizards by robbing the Muggles of theirs. In the midst of all this, Newt's journey is then sidetracked by Tina's (Katherine Waterston) return, having been sent to Paris for the same reason. With both Grindelwald and Credence on the loose, Newt is torn between doing what he believes is right and if he's willing to choose a side in the process.

Eddie Redmayne returns as the beloved magizoologist Newt Scamander, and while he still has those lovable cheerful moments, he's slightly lost the lively charm that made Newt endearing in the first installment, but the script would perhaps play a part in this. He's gone a little solemn this time around, caught in something much deeper and a little more personal. The first film managed to show his fascination and enthusiasm towards the fantastic beasts that he sought after, but because there isn't much interaction with the beasts and the film's decision to focus elsewhere, a part of that is missing. That's not to say it is entirely gone or that it's a bad thing. Some of that familiar lovable manner is still there. There would be moments where his loving charm stands out, such as how he expresses his excitement upon finding clues in search of the now reinstated Auror and former companion, Waterston's Tina Goldstein. "She has incredibly narrow feet, have you noticed?" Newt says in awe. "Can't say I have," Jacob looks upon him with a look of confusion while Newt carries along with his search.



Image source: IMDB

The Crimes of Grindelwald has a much steadier tone than its predecessor, going for a darker tone for most of the film's duration. The palette is more saturated and muted, with the bustling and dim view of New York in a heavy rain, the much brightly colored Ministry of Magic in London (which is where Newt's story picks up), and the saturated streets of Paris. It is, like the installment before it, and most of the Harry Potter films; visually stunning. Whether or not the story excels, J.K Rowling through her script and Yates through his directing, they have imbued excellent world building, extending the wizarding world to new heights. The magic and wonder is still there, leaping in a constantly engaging manner. Secret magic portals, the return of the gold-loving nifflers, and a wizard's version of a circus attraction, carry the film's boisterous wonder that really makes you wonder why you can't enter the screen and visit such a world. The opening chase sequence that is Grindelwald's very own Great Escape is one of the more brilliantly directed scenes, immediately taking audiences by the hand to invite them over for what the film has in store. It's a compelling opening and introduction to the film's main villain. It has a lot of potential to build from there, the unfortunate thing is that if you look at the story, it doesn't seem to realize the kind of potential it has to do the visuals and the wonders justice.

So here's the main catch: it has too many things going on at once. The first Fantastic Beasts had solid world building with a much more cohesive main plot. While Rowling has a gift for world building and characters, it seemed that here, what goes on paper has not translated well on screen. The Crimes of Grindelwald lacks a cohesive buildup and an actual resolution. In fact, it lacks an actual story, the centre of what everything in the film is supposed to lead up to. Newt's adventures this time is muddled with sudden reunions and plot twists that had it not been placed with an array of the film's many arcs, would have made for a perfectly magical ride. Grindelwald, on the other hand, who is the main villain, mind you, is disappointingly bland, but it has more to do with the material Depp's given than his performance. You're first given a glimpse at Grindelwald's antics during the opening (which is a great start to the film, honestly), but for the rest of the film's duration, he's overshadowed and sidelined for other characters who frankly, end up not having any purpose in the film at all. Grindelwald may have been constantly refered to as one of the most powerful wizards in the wizarding world, which makes him a dangerous threat, but we don't see that here. For a film called Crimes of Grindelwald, it's quite baffling that they would focus on everyone else but Grindelwald. 



Image source: IMDB

The film becomes its own kind of obscurus, awfully muddled and unable to create a central story with everything that happens. It feels too much like pieces of a puzzle that had just came together, but still separate and incomplete. Think of it like a buffet where you constantly pick whatever looks good. You end up picking a lot of things and before you know it, you're unable to stuff your stomach with more food. That is essentially what The Crimes of Grindelwald is: overstuffed with subplots that eventually flood the main story, if the film has a clear story at all, to the point where it feels like it's been tossed aside or lost its way. The problem is, it really doesn't know which arc provides most to the story, so it puts as much arc as possible to give you a lot more than a full stomach and a headache at best. The constant revelations that serve as a twist are certainly a surprise, but not the best kind. Even when it's something you don't see coming, you start groaning in annoyance anyways because it has more to do with an obligatory setup for the next installments, but little to do with the story it's telling now, like the unecessary Justice League setup in Batman vs Superman.

There's cases of flashbacks, defining someone's legacy, figuring out the past, and chasing beasts, all arcs from the film's vault of several different characters; that are more of a distraction from the story than providing any real progression or relation to the main storyline, which really begs the question: what is the story trying to achieve here? Or the more dire question: what story are they actually telling here? Because it isn't clear at all of the endgame and the core story that the film is aiming for, leaving it muddled and unable to place its foot on the right stool, continuously going on different directions without a clear destination. A wider ensemble and bigger sheer of storytelling doesn't always mean a better sequel, and the issue with The Crimes of Grindelwald is that it doesn't know where the limit of arcs lie or when to turn down the noise, trapped in its own tornado of potential arcs that don't have a center to intertwine together. The first installment, despite having a similar problem, was at least able to tie most arcs together and have a clear story. Newt's coming to America, Credence and his adopted mother, Percival Graves and his obsession with finding the person behind the obscurus; they all serve a purpose to the main story.

But at least there's the beasts, right? Yes, but let's stop at that. They're simply decorations, admired but hardly play a part in the party other than to give the room (or the film in this case) some flair. They do provide some of the film's illustrious charm, but again, they're really just toppings on an ice cream. Other than the beasts, it is really the performances that are the film's shining beacon, particularly Jude Law as Dumbledore. In a muddled mess of a film with a one note villain, the return of a beloved character becomes the film's savior. This Dumbledore, a much younger and more active wizard, provides a much needed charm. Unfortunately, his part is fairly small here, perhaps saved for another film, because there are other things this film intend to focus on. But when he's on screen, his wit and calm demeanor is enough to leave audiences wanting more of Law's portrayal. When it comes to his scenes and at Hogwarts (Potterheads, you better be ready for a pang of nostalgia when this happens), there's always that speck of hope that the film does have its moments, and it actually does have its moments, enough for it to not fully be a mess, enjoyable at best. Hopefully with a more cohesive story at hand next time, it could lead future installments to a magical homerun.



Image source: IMDB

Overall verdict: The Crimes of Grindelwald is certainly intriguing when it comes to charming audiences with its glorious wonders of the wizarding world. Redmayne, despite his character losing a little of that charm that made him endearing, is still quite excellent in the lead role. Jude Law as Dumbledore is perhaps the standout out of the cast, making the most out of his limited screen time. This installment still carries on the charm and wonder that the previous installment, and the Harry Potter films, had brilliantly brought, though it lacks the feeling of an actual adventure that the first Fantastic Beasts installment excelled at. The story however, however, is muddled and plucks arcs that seem interesting, and places them on a plate without any coherence as to where it's supposed to go. The revelations feel like a confusing setup for the next installments rather than serving the story it's telling in this one. Because it's overstuffed with incoherent arcs, it loses the story it wants to tell in the progress, which is unfortunate, especially since they have nearly every untapped potential, just waiting to discovered.

Stars: 2.7/5



By Nadia Ranaputri

Image source: IMDB


Director: Bryan Singer
Cast: Rami Malek, Lucy Boynton, Ben Hardy, Gwilym Lee, Joseph Mazzello, Aidan Gillen, Tom Hollander, Mike Myers.


Believe it or not, the very first exposure I had to Queen was through Ella Enchanted, where Anne Hathaway belted out 'Somebody to Love' in a pub filled with giants. My then nine year old self upon watching the film at the time believed that it was the film's original song, which is silly considering that I then found out that it was a cover of the song that was originally sung by none other than Queen. To this day, Queen remains as one of the most iconic bands in history, their songs have hit the top of the charts several times and used in several films such as Ella Enchanted (Somebody to Love), Wayne's World (Bohemian Rhapsody), Shaun of the Dead ('Don't Stop Me Now' and 'You're My Best Friend'), and even had multiple songs covered by Glee. Queen is loved by the masses from one generation to another. Bryan Singer's new biopic, Bohemian Rhapsody, aims to tell the story of just how this band entered the music forray and the story of their eccentric frontrunner, Freddie Mercury; to the modern audience.

Bohemian Rhapsody starts off with the soon-to-be Queen front runner Freddie Mercury (born Farrokh Bulsara) moving luggages in Heathrow Airport during the day. At night though, he visits a local pub and listens to a band he's been following, hoping to show some of his songs to them. Turns out, it's his lucky day, because the band's lead singer just so happens to abandon the band just after their performance, leaving the spot open to Freddie, who eagerly leaps to take the opportunity. As they begin playing in other local gigs, they begin to get recognized when music manager John Reid (Aiden Gillen) stumbles upon their recording booth. They begin to work with Reid and with the support of their label EMI (run by Ray Foster (Mike Myers), who's reluctant over the band's experimental delve in music), they begin their tour around the world, selling out shows, and becoming the band that everyone knows and loves. However, as their success rises, their personal issues follow suit, particularly Freddie, who's figuring out his sexual orientation, despite being happily in love with his partner Mary Austin (Lucy Boynton); and the media's eventual intrusion on his personal life.

Rami Malek is a star stunner as Freddie Mercury, fully embracing the frontman's enigmatic mannerisms and his passion in creating music. Malek not only nails Mercury's look, but his spontenaeous ways and every bit of how Mercury works on stage. Mercury's struts, flaunts, turns, and flicks are so intricately portrayed and Malek just dissolves into Mercury, getting almost every bit of the frontrunner's moves. At times, he's doe-eyed and curious, especially during his younger years, eagerly following a band he's fond of and willing to impress the remaining band members who just so happens to be Brian May and Roger Taylor when he finds that the band's lead singer had just quit. When he gets on stage, that's where he sheds that doe-eyed look and trades it for sharp turns and magnetic sway. You're instantly drawn into his portrayal with his every turn at the beat. And even when it comes to his more vulnerable moments, Malek just outshines every other actor in the room, making sure that Mercury's inner search for identity and struggle comes through on screen. Queen's other band members, Roger Taylor, Brian May, and John Deacon, played respectively by Ben Hardy, Gwilym Lee, and Joe Mazzello; all put impressive performances and create a genuine dynamic together with Malek, despite them not being as established as Malek's Freddie Mercury. 


Image source: IMDB


The thing that really made Bohemian Rhapsody a gem is its artistic aspects. The recreation of Queen's musical numbers is spectacular to watch, especially if you're fond of Queen, you're likely to sing along and have a good time doing it. Each of the performances are captivating, capturing the essence of what made Queen's performances so iconic, especially with Malek brilliantly embodying Mercury's mannerisms on stage. The Live Aid performance gets a special mention here because it is really where the film takes the high road and gives Queen the performance of their lives. This is also where I admittedly shed tears in sheer delight of how amazing this sequence was recreated and the performances in it. And what also made it mesmerizing was its cinematography, which is really quite something, from the opening long shot of Freddie getting ready to enter the stage to the beat of 'Somebody to Love' that ends with a glide of the massive audience awaiting Queen's performance (which is actually one of my most favorite sequences of the film), to a wide shot of Queen performing the hell out of a show. It's visually appealing, and is the aspect apart from the performances that prevents the film from fully crashing down.

Spanning the 15 years of their rise to stardom and eventual success, Bohemian Rhapsody has the weight of cramming the many events that occur during those fifteen years, like who Freddie Mercury was before he was Freddie Mercury, how the band was brought together, how they got their band name Queen, and the struggles they had in making it in the music scene. It is suprisingly fast paced for a film that's more than two hours, but then again, it does have a lot to cover. For the first hour, the film is filled with quirky wit that does work most of the time, like the doe-eyed young Mercury belting out tunes in the parking lot in front of his future bandmates Brian May and Roger Taylor, his eccentric choice in fashion ("I've got to make an impression, darling," he confidently says when he's questioned about his clothing), the band mixing non-musical objects with their music, or Roger Taylor constantly having to repeat his high notes on the "Galileo" part in the 'Bohemian Rhapsody' song several times until the recording tape is nearly spent. But their dedication in showcasing their music to the world is relentless, from only playing in pubs to becoming one of the most iconic bands in history- from their music producer stating, "Mark my words, no one will play Queen," to the point where one of the characters say in the film, "When they hear Queen, ears perk up."

Bohemian Rhapsody manages to present the fact that despite their success, Queen has their issues as a band. There are scenes where they argue over whose song they want to use (one fairly hilarious scene being an argument about whether or not they want to use Roger Taylor's song 'I'm in Love with My Car' that leads to Taylor nearly throwing a coffee machine), and questioning some creative decisions regarding the songs. But at its center is Freddie Mercury's personal life, struggling with his sexuality and trying to keep anyone else besides the people closest to him from prying into anything other than his music. It is at most parts, executed well and also heartbreaking at some point, humanizing Queen's eccentric lead singer. This is mostly propelled by Malek's performances, who is effortless in portraying Mercury's struggles between his personal choices both in music and in his lifestyle. Mercury has personal issues that clashes alongside the media that constantly barges him with questions of interest regarding his sexuality, the focus merely on him than his band and their music. He throws lavish parties in his mansion, but cannot bring himself to face the fact that he'll eventually be alone at some point, asking his bandmates or his former partner Mary Austin to accompany him for dinner or for a drink when he spends the night alone.


Image source: IMDB

But when it comes to how Mercury's personal drama that surrounds him was executed during the second half of the film, that's where it gets most of its ups and downs. It's understandable that some things won't go into focus, but sometimes the film feels confused between wanting to focus on Mercury or Queen. It mainly focuses on the former, but that would mean the other members would have to take a back seat, though they're not fully shadowed by Mercury here. At some parts, it may feel underwhelming, mainly due to the pacing of each sequence (save for the Live Aid performance). Sometimes sudden developments are thrown at us without prior foundation as to why it was there, and it may take you aback for a second, particularly at the band's road to stardom and deep insight into their struggles as a band. It really jumps too swiftly from having the band do small gigs, and the next thing you know, they have a manager that's suddenly convinced to work with them by a single statement and sky-rocketting to instant fame. Some might be bothered by that, and to tell you the truth, I was slightly bothered by it too. It does affect the story and even if it does manage to show Mercury and Queen's struggles in a way that made them accessible to tug at heartstrings, it's everything else that surrounds them that prevents the film from hitting that sweet high note, the homerun that could have made it great.

Flaws aside, Bohemian Rhapsody was honestly very enjoyable, capturing some of Queen's essence as a band and their experimental music that would become much loved and iconic until today (though yes, there are some errors in the accurate depiction of for example, the era of a song's initial release). It's eccentricly magnetic in all the right ways, there's a big amount of wonderful chemistry between Malek, Hardy, Lee, and Mazzello. There's a brilliant scene where their music producer refuses to take risks with the band, and the band replies to this by stating that the name Queen serves as a mystery, that they could take any genre of music and incorporate it into theirs. It's scenes like those that really made Bohemian Rhapsody shine. It's captivating when the band starts to belt out the iconic tunes, but sometimes lacks when it comes to some part of the film's story execution, though I have to admit, it is still a damn good time. When walking out of this film, you're really going to leave with one thing in mind: that Queen and their lead singer Freddie Mercury will forever remain as icons for the ages. "You're a legend, Fred," Roger Taylor says. Mercury smiles and with the outmost fondness, says back, "We're all legends."


Image source: IMDB


Overall verdict: Bohemian Rhapsody thrives in visual appeal, recreating Queen's performances in spectacular fashion, led by Rami Malek's magnetic performance as Freddie Mercury. Malek stuns in embodying Queen's frontruner with his eccentric mannerisms on stage, drawing us to his performance. Ben Hardy, Gwilym Lee, and Joe Mazzello manages to stand alongside Malek fairly well, particularly when it came to the band's dynamic. Its striking cinematography is also where the film really shines through, capturing each performance, be it on stage or behind it. However, it does suffer in pacing that affects the story, making sudden developments happen that could take the audience aback for a second. Some things could have been explored more, but since it's cramming a story spanning 15 years, it is understandable that not everything is going go be delved further. Despite that, Bohemian Rhapsody really is a good time, and it's the kind of film that you'd sing your heart out shamelessly through every Queen song that plays throughout the film. It's not exactly a homerun, but it has every potential to be, and for nearly much of the parts, it does realize that.

Stars: 3.5/5

Trailer
Newer Posts Older Posts Home

HELLO THERE!

Welcome to my blog! I'm an English Literature graduate navigating through a sea of films and books.

Categories

  • Articles/Editorials 12
  • Film Reviews 84
  • Movie Rewinds 6
  • Series Reviews 5

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Advertisement

Powered by Blogger.

Report Abuse

  • Home
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • ►  2021 (15)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2020 (10)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  February (2)
  • ►  2019 (9)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ▼  2018 (26)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ▼  November (3)
      • Ralph Breaks the Internet- Review
      • Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald- Review
      • Bohemian Rhapsody - Review
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (3)
  • ►  2017 (27)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2016 (20)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)

Search This Blog

Blog Archive

  • 2021 15
    • July 1
    • June 2
    • May 1
    • March 2
    • February 4
    • January 5
  • 2020 10
    • December 5
    • November 1
    • May 2
    • February 2
  • 2019 9
    • November 3
    • October 1
    • September 1
    • July 1
    • May 2
    • March 1
  • 2018 26
    • December 3
    • November 3
      • Ralph Breaks the Internet- Review
      • Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald- Review
      • Bohemian Rhapsody - Review
    • October 3
    • September 1
    • July 3
    • June 2
    • May 2
    • April 3
    • March 3
    • February 3
  • 2017 27
    • December 4
    • November 1
    • October 5
    • September 4
    • August 2
    • July 3
    • May 2
    • April 1
    • March 3
    • January 2
  • 2016 20
    • December 2
    • November 8
    • October 4
    • September 3
    • May 1
    • April 1
    • March 1
Show more Show less

Pages

  • Home
  • Home
  • Film Reviews
  • Series Reviews
  • Movie Rewinds
  • Editorials
  • What's Listed
  • Home
  • Features
  • _post format
  • _error page
  • Beauty
  • Fashion
  • Lifestyle
  • Contact
  • Buy now

Popular Posts

  • Nomadland- Review
    By Nadia Ranaputri Image credit: IMDB Director: ChloƩ Zhao Cast: Frances McDormand, David Straithairn, Linda May, Swankie, Peter Spears, Bo...
  • Shadow and Bone- Series Review
    By Nadia Ranaputri Image credit: TIME Series directors: Lee Toland Krieger, Dan Liu, Mairzee Almas, and Jeremy Webb. Cast: Jessie Mei Li, Be...
  • A Quiet Place Part II- Review
    By Nadia Ranaputri Image credit: IMDB Director: John Krasinski Cast: Emily Blunt, Cillian Murphy, Millicent Simmonds, Noah Jupe, Djimon Houn...
  • Home
  • Features
    • Error Page
    • Short Codes
  • Documentation
  • Download This Template

featured posts

Advertisement

Copyright © Mockingbird In A Blizzard. Designed by OddThemes